Why Merriam-Webster Changed the Definition of “Vaccine”

The public has been duped. We’ve been lied to. Most people, including me, thought the concept of a vaccine against Covid-19 was an excellent idea. During Operation Warp Speed which produced vaccines in 2020 for use in 2021, most of the USA cheered on this effort.

But we were operating with the understanding of the common meaning of the term “VACCINE”. Did you know that ONE of EIGHT popular dictionaries completely re-defined the word “vaccine” in January and updated that definition again in June 2021?

Yep. In sports, we have a word that describes the changing of rules in the middle of the game:  Cheating.  The public thought they were getting a vaccine. They weren’t. The Government knew it.  Politicians knew it.  Drug companies knew it.  Social Media and Mainstream Media knew it. 

Yet they lied anyway. 

So instead of telling the truth, and to give cover to those pushing a narrative instead of the truth on the American public and the world at large, Miriam-Webster conveniently changed the definition of the word “vaccine” to fit this new narrative. 

The problem is . . . NOBODY ELSE was aware of this change of definition.  The worldwide public held to the definitions which are STILL in most of the world’s English dictionaries.  But not Merriam-Webster.  Here’s a little history of this word game.

Traditional Definition of the Word “Vaccine” From Various Dictionaries

Why did ONE of the EIGHT most popular English language dictionaries change its definition of “vaccine” in January 2021 and then update it to fit the official narrative even better in June 2021?

Answer:  To give plausible deniability and cover to all those promoting a false narrative about the “safe and effective” mRNA gene therapies where Merriam-Webster has now included in their July 2021 updated definition of the word. 

You should note that all other dictionaries did NOT change their definition. Are they not “woke” enough? Or are they just trying to preserve the English language without redefining words to fit a political agenda?

Why is the Miriam-Webster Dictionary definition of “vaccine” most often cited now when people argue about “what is a vaccine?”

  1. Prior to January 26, 2021, Miriam-Webster Dictionary, the most popular English language dictionary, defined it as follows (source Aletho News):

Graphical user interface, text, application

Description automatically generated

  1. Here’s the Dictionary.com definition of vaccine as of November 22, 2021:
    Graphical user interface, text, application, email

Description automatically generated
  2. Here’s the British Dictionary definition for Vaccine:
    Graphical user interface, text, application, email

Description automatically generated
  3. Here’s the American Heritage Medical Dictionary definition for Vaccine:
    Graphical user interface, text, application, email

Description automatically generated
  4. Here’s the American Heritage Science Dictionary definition for Vaccine:
    Graphical user interface, text, application, email

Description automatically generated
  5. Definition of vaccine from the Cambridge Dictionary:
    Graphical user interface, text, application

Description automatically generated
  6. Definition of vaccine from YourDictionary.com:
    Graphical user interface, text, application, email

Description automatically generated
  7. Definition of vaccine in Macmillon Dictionary:
    Graphical user interface, text, email, website

Description automatically generated

The “NEW” Definition of Vaccine from Miriam-Webster

On or about January 26, 2021, Miriam-Webster had re-defined the word vaccine to include a section on genetic material:

Graphical user interface, text, application

Description automatically generated

Evidently, this wasn’t good enough to silence the critics (like me) that these Covid-19 shots (gene therapies) do NOT meet the traditional definition of vaccine, Miriam-Webster further re-defined the term AGAIN as follows in June 2021 (source is Aletho News and Mirriam-Webster Online Dictionary):

Text, letter

Description automatically generated

So now, the government-tech-social-network-woke narrative “requires” the modification of the word vaccine itself to convince you that the mRNA/DNA gene therapy shots are vaccines – so you will assume they’re long-lasting (which they are not) and that they are “safe and effective” . . . also “NOT”.

I and thousands of others are doing our best to sound a warning.

AS I HAVE SAID BEFORE IN THIS SERIES OF ARTICLES ABOUT COVID-19:  SOMETHING IS WRONG HERE.  VERY WRONG.

Share This Post

Subscribe for notification of new articles

More Articles You May Like

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Questions, Comments or Suggestions?

drop Me a Line and keep in touch